This
digital document is an
article from
Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations,
published by
Relations Industrielles on
September 22, 1998. The length of the article is 5990 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: The objectives of this paper are: first, to determine whether layoffs disproportionately affect members of employment equity designated groups; and, second, to assess the importance of seniority in any adverse impacts. Our hypothesis is that seniority is an important criterion for layoffs and that, on average, designated group members tend to have less seniority and would therefore be disproportionately affected by layoffs. If this hypothesis is correct, then layoffs may constitute systemic discrimination since there is a reasonable alternative policy in the form of reduced hours through worksharing, which would affect all groups similarly. Empirical tests confirmed that the probability of a layoff was higher for designated group members. The role of the seniority system in this relationship, however, was contrary to our hypothesis since the relationship between the probability of a layoff designated group status was weaker at unionized workplaces than at nonunion workplaces. We conclude that the case for worksharing is strengthened by its potential to reduce the systematic discrimination against designated groups which results from the use of layoffs. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Citation DetailsTitle: Are seniority-based layoffs discriminatory? The adverse impact of layoffs on designated groups.
Author: Gangaram Singh
Publication:Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations (Refereed)
Date: September 22, 1998
Publisher: Relations Industrielles
Volume: 53
Issue: 4
Page: 730(2)
Distributed by Thomson Gale.
Price:
$5.95
[
Notify me when price goes down.]